Concerns Raised Over Unmodified Electroconvulsive Therapy at Central Institute of Psychiatry, India

  • Post author:
  • Reading time:6 mins read

A recent article published in the Times of India sheds light on a worrying practice at the Central Institute of Psychiatry (CIP) in India.

Despite laws forbidding it, the institute still uses a controversial treatment known as “direct” or “unmodified” electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

 (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following treatments shall
not be performed on any person with mental illness—
(a) electro-convulsive therapy without the use of muscle relaxants and
anaesthesia;
(b) electro-convulsive therapy for minors;
Page 39, Section 95 of India’s The Mental Healthcare Act (MHCA) of 2017, prohibited procedures *116GI.p65 (mohfw.gov.in)

This treatment, done without anesthesia and muscle relaxants, can be risky and traumatic for patients.

Despite laws prohibiting it, the Central Institute of Psychiatry (CIP) in India continues to administer electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) without anesthesia. This troubling practice has raised ethical concerns and prompted questions about patient rights.

A doctor who worked at CIP revealed that this practice persists because many patients are uneducated, unaware that they can request modified ECT.

“…’they continue to do it in CIP taking advantage of the fact that the majority of the patients are uneducated and belong to low socioeconomic sections and do not know enough to demand modified ECT,’ said a doctor who had worked in CIP.”

Additionally, some psychiatrists argue that direct ECT should be allowed in resource-poor settings because it is perceived as equally safe and inexpensive:

“Some psychiatrists argue that direct ECT ought to be allowed in resource poor settings since direct ECT was “just as safe and cheaper’.”

Even though CIP has resources for safer alternatives, it continues to use this outdated method.

This raises ethical concerns and questions about patient rights. Despite authorities being alerted to these issues, no action has been taken. According to Times of India article:

“In August 2022, the National Human Rights Commissions (NHRC) had expressed serious concern over the apathetic attitude of the authorities in CIP towards providing quality mental health care.

CIP being a centrally funded institution, queries on this issue were sent to the union health ministry and the office of the CIP director. Neither have responded. If they respond, the article will be updated online.”

References:

  1. Times of India. “Central institute uses electroconvulsive therapy without sedation though law prohibits it.” [Online] Available: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/central-institute-uses-electroconvulsive-therapy-without-sedation-though-law-prohibits-it/articleshow/107636331.cms
  2. The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, as provided by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, outlines regulations concerning mental healthcare in India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, “The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017,” [Online]. Available: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/Mental%20Healthcare%20Act%2C%202017_0.pdf
  3. A Focus Group Study of Indian Psychiatrists’ Views on Electroconvulsive Therapy under India’s Mental Healthcare Act 2017: ‘The Ground Reality Is Different’.” Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 41, no. 6 (2019): 507-515. Accessed March 31, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_247_19.
  4. The Central Istitute for Psychiatry’s website says in regards to ECT “Facility for modified electroconvulsive therapy is available both on inpatient and outpatient basis.”

More on ECT in India

Anna

Anna is a childhood psychiatric drug and a teenage electroshock survivor. She founded Life After ECT to ensure people injured by electroconvulsive therapy have easy access to resources that can help them understand their injuries and find a path to recovery.